Phylogenetic Analysis of Streptomyces spp. Isolated from Soil Samples in Sulaimani Governorate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v10n1y2020.pp18-24Keywords:
Actinobacteria, Streptomyces, Antibiotic, 16Sr DNA and Diaminopimelic acid, SoilAbstract
Streptomyces species have been an important source of bioactive secondary metabolites and clinically useful for antibiotic production, including fosfomycin, daptomycin, oxytetracycline, streptomycin, and chloramphenicol. The main objective of this study was to isolate actinomycetes, especially Streptomyces from 8 soil samples that collected from two different places, which are districts in Sulaimani governorate, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Totally, 30 diagnostic tests were carried out for representative of isolated Streptomyces depending on the color groups. The 16Sr DNA gene was sequenced, for ten isolated test strains were amplified with 2 universal primers after extraction of genomic DNA, only 8 of them were successfully sequenced. Phylogenetic analysis of 8 test strains carried out using base sequences of 16Sr DNA genes in the core genome. Four of isolated test strains were identified as a Streptomyces fulvissimus, and others were nominated as a Streptomyces anulatus. The obtained sequence data were compared with the sequence data of the closest related species in the international databases using EzTaxon Server program and (%) similarities were determined. Finally, phylogenetic analysis indicated that isolated test strains were nominated as (H001, H002, H003, and H004), which recognized members of the S. anulatus and the similarity with their type strain is 99.93%. Whereas, other four isolated test strains, including D001, D002, D003, and D004 recognized as members of the S. fulvissimus and similarity with their type strain is 100%.
Downloads
References
Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
Antony-Babu, S., J. E. M. Stach and M. Goodfellow. 2010. Computerassisted numerical analysis of colour-group data for dereplication of streptomycetes for bioprospecting and ecological purposes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 97: 231-239.
Asamizu, S., T. Ozaki, K. Teramoto, K. Satoh and H. Onaka. 2015. Killing of mycolic acid-containing bacteria aborted induction of antibiotic production by Streptomyces in combined-culture. PLoS One. 10(11): 1-17.
Atalan, E. 1993. Selective isolation, characterisation and identification of some Streptomyces species. Biosci. Biotech. Res. Asia. 14(4): 1401-1407.
Atalan, E., G. P. Manfio, A. C. Ward, R. M. Kroppenstedt and M. Goodfellow. 2000. Biosystematic studies on novel streptomycetes from soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 77: 337-353.
Bérdy, J. 2005. Bioactive microbial metabolites. J. Antibiot. 58(1): 1-26.
Bunyapaiboonsri, T., S. Lapanun, S. Supothina, P. Rachtawee, S. Chunhametha, C. Suriyachadkun, T. Boonruangprapa, P. Auncharoen, C. Chutraku and V. Vichai. 2016. Polycyclic tetrahydroxanthones from Streptomyces chrestomyceticus BCC 24770. Tetrahedron. 72(5): 775-778.
Chun, J. and M, Goodfellow. 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Nocardia with 16S rRNA gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45: 240-245.
Cui, X. L. 2012. Streptomonospora. In : Goodfellow, M., P. Kämpfer, H. J. Busse, M. E. Trujillo, K. I. Suzukim, W. Ludwig and W. B. Whitman, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd. Vol. 5. Springer, Berlin, Germany. p1908-1814.
Dyson, P. 2011. Streptomyces: Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. V. Press, Poole, UK.
Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum-likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17: 368-376.
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39(4): 783-791.
Fitch, W. 1971. Towards designing a course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20: 406-416.
Goodfellow, M. and H. P. Fiedler. 2010. A guide to successful bioprospecting: Informed by actinobacterial systematics. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 98: 119-142.
Hasani, A., A. Kariminik and K. Issazadeh. 2014. Streptomycetes : Characteristics and their antimicrobial activities. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biomed. Res. 2(1): 63-75.
Hopwood, D. 2007. Streptomyces in Nature and Medcine. Oxford University Press, New York.
Jukes, T. H. and C. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Academic Press, New York. p21-132.
Kampfer, P., M. Steiof and W. Dott. 1991. Microbiological characterization of a fuel oil contaminated site including numerical identification of heterotrophic water and soil bacteria.
Microb. Ecol. 21: 227-251.
Kim, O. S., Y. J. Cho, K. Lee, S. H. Yoon, M. Kim, H. Na, S. C. Park, Y. S. Jeon, J. Lee, H. Yi, S. Won and Chun. 2012. Introducing EzTaxon-e: A prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence data base with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62: 716-721.
Küster, E. and S. T. Williams. 1964. Selection of media for isolation of streptomycetes. Nature. 202: 928-929.
Lewin, G. R., C. Carlos, M. G. Chevrette, H. A. Horn, B. R. McDonald, R. J. Stankey, B. G. Fpox and C. Currie. 2016. Evolution and ecology of actinobacteria and their bioenergy applications. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 70: 235-254.
Maleki, H., A. Dehnad, S. Hanifian and S. Khani. 2013. Isolation and molecular identification of Streptomyces spp. with antibacterial activity from Northwest of Iran. Bioimpacts. 3(3): 129-134.
Mao, J., J. Wang, H. Q. Dai, Z. D. Zhang, Q. Y. Tang, B. Ren, N. Yang, M. Goodfellow, L. X. Zhang and Z. Liu. 2011. Yuhushiella deserti gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the suborder Pseudonocardineae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61: 621-630.
Mokrane, S., N. Bouras, N. Sabaou and F. Mathieu. 2013. Actinomycetes from saline and non-saline soils of Saharan palm groves: Taxonomy, ecology and antagonistic properties. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 7(20): 2167-2178.
Newman, D. J. and G. Cragg. 2007. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. J. Nat. Prod. 70: 461-477.
Olsen, G. J. and C. R. Woese. 1993. Ribosomal RNA: A key to phylogeny. FASEB J. 7: 113-123.
Omura, S. 1992. Theexpandedhorizonformicrobialmetabolites areview. Gene. 115: 141-149.
Pitcher, D. G., N. A. Saunders and R. Owen. 1989. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 8: 151-156.
Reed, J. F. and R. Cumming. 1945. Soil reaction glass electrodes and calorimetric methods for determining pH value of soil. Soil Sci. 59: 97-104.
Saitou, N. and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
Sembiring, L., A. C. Ward and M. Goodfellow. 2000. Selective isolation and characterization of members of the Streptomyces violaceusniger clade associated with the roots of Paraserianthes falcataria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 78: 353-366.
Stackebrandt, E., W. Frederiksen, G. M. Garrity, P. A. Grimont, P. Kampfer, M. C. Maiden, X. Nesme, R. Rossello-Mora, J. Swings, H. G. Truper, L. Vauterin, D. A. C. War and W. Whitman. 2002. Report of the ad hoc committee for the reevaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52: 1043-1047.
Tamura, K., G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski and S. Kumar. 2013. MEGA6 : Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6. 0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30(12): 2725-2729.
Tan, G. Y. A., S. Robinson, E. Lacey and M. Goodfellow. 2006. Amycolatopsis australiensis sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from arid soils. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56: 2297-2301.
Trujillo M. E, M. Goodfellow. 2012. Haloactinospora. In: Goodfellow, M., P. Kämpfer, H. J. Busse, M. E. Trujillo, K. I. Suzuki, W. I. Ludwig and W. B. Whitman. editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd., Vol. 5. Springer, Berlin, Germany. p51907-1908.
Vetsigian, K., R. Jajoo and R. Kishony. 2011. Structure and evolution of Streptomyces interaction networks in soil and in silico. PLoS Biol. 9(10): 1-12.
Vickers, J. C., S. T. Williams and G. Ross. 1984. A taxonomic approach to selective isolation of Streptomyces. Biol. Biochem. Biomed. Aspects Actinomycetes. 1: 553-561.
Waksman, S. A. and A. T. Henrici. 1943. The nomenclature and classification of the actinomycetes. J. Bacteriol. 46: 337-341.
Watkins. 2013. Factors Influencing the Distribution of Soil Streptomyces spp. and Determination of Species Capable of Producing a Neurodegenerative Metabolite. The University of Albama, Alabama.
Williams, S. T., M. Goodfellow, G. Alderson, E. M. H. Wellington, P. H. A. Sneath and M. J. Sackin. 1983. Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129: 1743-1813.
Witt, D. and E. Stackebrandt. 1990. Unification of the genera streptoverticillium and Streptomyces, and amendation of Streptomyces Waksman and Henrici 1943, 339AL. Syst. Appl.
Microbiol. 13: 361-371.
Yousif, G., K. Busarakam and B. K. M. Goodfellow. 2015. Streptomyces mangrovi sp. nov., isolated from mangrove forest sediment. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 108(3): 783-791.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Syamand A. Qadir, Miran H. Qadir, Osama H. Shareef, Aryan M. Faraj
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).