Mesiodistal Crown Diameter of Normal Occlusion and Different Malocclusion Groups for a Sample of Kurdish Population of Erbil City

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v10n1y2020.pp32-37

Keywords:

Crown diameter, Mesiodistal crown width, Normal occlusion, Tooth size, Malocclusion

Abstract

It is essential to know the tooth crown size to provide accurate diagnosis and treatment planning to ensure the satisfactory outcome of orthodontic treatment. The aim of the present study was to measure and compare mesiodistal crown diameter of a Kurdish sample in Erbil city with normal and different classes of malocclusion. The mesiodistal tooth width was measured by an electronic digital caliper on a total of 150 (75 males and 75 females) orthodontic models of secondary school students of different occlusal relationships (Class I normal occlusion, Class I, Class II division I, Class II division II, and Class III malocclusions). The results showed that (1) the maxillary right first molar was significantly larger than the left one and both maxillary right lateral incisors and first premolars were larger than their contralateral teeth at the level of P < 0.01. (2) Both upper and lower canine were significantly smaller in females than in males; (3) Class I malocclusion showed tendency toward larger teeth than the rest of the other occlusal categories; (4) no statistically significant differences in tooth size were found among the Class II division I, division II, and Class III malocclusions when compared to normal occlusion. In conclusion, females had smaller teeth than males and there was asymmetry between the right and left sides in tooth size and Class I malocclusion showed tendency toward larger teeth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agenter, M. K., E. F. Harris and R. N. Blair. 2009. Influence of tooth crown size on malocclusion. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 136(6): 795-804.

Alam, M. K., F. Shahid, K. Purmal, B. Ahmad and M. F. Khamis. 2014. Tooth size and dental arch dimension measurement through cone beam computed tomography: Effect of age and gender. Res. J. Recent Sci. 3: 85-94.

Al-Khateeb, S. N. and E. S. J. Abu Alhaija. 2006. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthod. 76: 459-465.

Al-Rashdan, M. S. 1996. Odontometric Study of Maxillary and Mandibular Permanent Teeth in Relation to Each Dimension in Iraqi Sample. Baghdad University, Iraq.

Al-Sahaf, N. H. 1991. Cross Sectional Study of Cephalometric Standards and Associated Growth Changes. Master Thesis, College of Dentistry. Baghdad University, Iraq.

Angle, E. H. 1899. Classification of malocclusion. Dent. Cosm. 41(18): 284-264.

Bermudez de Castro, J. M. and M. E. Nicolas. 1995. Posterior dental size reduction in hominids: The Atapuerca evidence. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 96: 335-356.

Bernabe, E., C. Flores-Mir and P. W. Major. 2004. Tooth width ratio discrepancies in a sample of Peruvian adolescents. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 125(3): 361-365.

Bjork, A., T. Brown and V. Skieller. 1984. Comparison of craniofacia growth in Australian Aboriginal and Danes, illustrated by longitudinal cephalometric analysis. Eur. J. Orthod. 6: 1-14.

Bolton, W. 1958. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 28(3): 113-130.

Brook, A. H., J. Jernvall, R. N. Smith, T. E. Hughes and G. C. Townsend. 2014. The dentition: The outcomes of morphogenesis leading to variations of tooth number, size and shape. Aust. Dent. J. 59: 131-142.

Burris, B. G. and F. H. Harris. 2000. Maxillary arch size and shape in american blacks and whites. Angle Orthod. 70: 297-302.

Fernandes, T. M., R. Sathler, G. L. Natalício, J. F. Henriques and A. Pinzan. 2013. Comparison of mesiodistal tooth widths in Caucasian, African and Japanese individuals with Brazilian ancestry and normal occlusion. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 18: 130-135.

Ghose, L. and V. Baghdady. 1979. Analysis of the Iraqi dentition: Mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth. J. Dent. Res. 58: 1047-1054.

Gorjizadeh, F., M. M. Javaheri and A. R. Maktabi. 2015. Analyzing mesiodistal widths of the permanent teeth. Iran. J. Orthop. 10: e4984.

Hashim, H. A. and S. A. F. Al-Ghamdi. 2005. Tooth width and arch dimension in normal and malocclusion samples. An odontometric study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2: 36-51.

Hattab, F. N., S. Al-Khateeb and I. Sultan. 1996. Mesiodistal crown diameter of permanent teeth in Jordanians. Arch. Oral Biol. 41: 641-645.

Heusdens, M., L. Dermaut and R. Verbeeck. 2000. The effect of tooth size discrepancy on occlusion: An experimental study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 117: 184-191.

Lavelle, C. L. 1972. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial group and in different occlusal categories. Am. J. Orthod. 61: 29-37.

Mahmood, A. D. 2012. A comparative study of tooth size and dental arch dimensions between Iraqi Arabs and Kurds with class I normal occlusion. Al-Rafidain Dent. J. 12: 71-79.

Maki, K., T. Nishioka, E. Shioiri, T. Takahashi and M. Kimura. 2002. Effects of dietary consistency on the mandible of rats at the growth stage: Computed X-ray densitometric and cephalometric analysis. Angle Orthod. 72(5): 468-475.

Mariano, P. P., A. P. Ferreira, P. Tavares and A. C. Braga. 2013. Different manifestations of Class II Division 2 incisor retroclination: A morphologic study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial.Orthop. 143(3): 310-316.

Mossey, P. A. 1999. The heritability of malocclusion: Part 1-Genetics principles and terminology. Br. J. Orthod. 26: 1113.

Nawar, A. G. and D. J. Al-Dabagh. 2014. Mesio-distal crown dimension of permanent dentition in normal, crowding, and spacing of young adult sample aged 18-25 years. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 26(4): 180-186.

Ngesa, J. L. 2003. Applicability of Tooth Size Predictions in the Mixed Dentition Analysis in a Kenyan Sample, Master Mini Thesis. University of the Western Cape, South Africa.

Peck, S., L. Peck and M. Kataja. 1998. Class II division 2 malocclusion: A heritable pattern of small teeth in well-developed Jaws. AngleOrthod. 1: 9-20.

Sanin, C. and B. S. Savara. 1971. An analysis of permanent mesiodistal crown size. Am. J. Orthod. 59(5): 488-500.

Santoro, M., M. Ayoub, V. Pardi and T. Cangialosi. 2000. Mesio-dista crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod. 70: 303-307.

Singh, S.P. and A. Goyal. 2006. Mesiodistal crown dimensions of the permanent dentition in North Indian children. Angle Orthod. 41: 293-299.

Wedrychowska-Szulc, B., J. Janiszewska-Olszowska and P. Stepien. 2010. Overall and anterior Bolton ratio in Class I, II, and III orthodontic patients. Eur. J. Orthod. 32: 313-318.

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Othman, R. J., & Alkhashan, J. A. (2020). Mesiodistal Crown Diameter of Normal Occlusion and Different Malocclusion Groups for a Sample of Kurdish Population of Erbil City. Polytechnic Journal, 10(1), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v10n1y2020.pp32-37

Issue

Section

Research Articles