Effect of Different Methods for the Overhang Amalgam Restorations Removal on Periodontal Health Status

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v10n1y2020.pp61-67

Keywords:

Amalgam overhang, Periodontal parameters, Bitewing X-ray, Plaque, Calculus

Abstract

Overhanging tooth restorations due to environmental change of the balance between beneficial bacteria and periodontopathogens lead to periodontal breakdown. This study aim was to evaluate the periodontal status after using different techniques for amalgam overhang removal. The proximal restorations were examined clinically and then radiographically by taking bitewing radiograph. From a total of 1200 patients examined in College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University and (Khanzad) Specialized Centre for Dentistry for presence of proximal amalgam restoration, for this interventional and prospective study, 45 patients with amalgam overhang were divided into three groups each 15 patients according to size and position of amalgam overhang each had one type of the following treatment (Refilling, Diamond Bur, EVA system) and 15 patients without amalgam overhang (control group) selected completed the trial. Clinical periodontal parameters were measured in teeth with amalgam overhang at baseline, 2 week, 1 and 3 months after removal of amalgam overhang. The results showed that the periodontal parameters showed a gradual decrease in all groups throughout the follow-up visits (except calculus index) and became a statistically significant in the 3 months follow-up following treatment (P < 0.001), with more reduction found in refilling group followed by EVA system then diamond bur group. In conclusion that it is better to replace the restoration rather than to use the other methods of treatment according to periodontal health which recorded by periodontal parameters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Farhan, K. and K. F. Al-Shammari. 2008. The effect of amalgam overhangs on alveolar bone loss. Saudi Med. J. 21(2): 155-160.

Arneberg, P., J. Silness and H. Nordbø. 1980. Marginal fit and cervical extent of Class II amalgam restorations related to periodontal condition: A clinical and roentgenological study of overhang elimination. J. Periodontal Res. 15(6): 669-677.

Axelsson, P. and J. Lindhe. 1974. The effect of a preventive programme on dental plaque, gingivitis and caries in schoolchildren. Results after one and two years. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1(2): 126-138.

Brunsvold, M. A. and J. J. Lane. 1990. The prevalence of overhanging dental restorations and their relationship to periodontal disease. J. Clin. Periodontol. 17(2): 67-72.

Chen, J. T. J., J. G. Burch, F. M. Beck and J. E. Horton. 1987. Periodontal attachment loss associated with proximal tooth restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 57(4): 416-420.

Claman, L. J., P. T. Koidis and J. G. Burch. 1986. Proximal tooth surface quality and periodontal probing depth. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 113(6): 890-893.

Eid, M. 1987. Relationship between overhanging amalgam restorations and periodontal disease. Quintessence Int. 18: 775-781.

Gilmore, N. and A. Sheiham. 1971. Overhanging dental restorations and periodontal disease. J. Periodontol. 42: 8-12.

Gorzo, I., H. N. Newman and J. D. Strahan. 1979. Amalgam restorations, plaque removal and periodontal health. J. Clin. Periodontol. 6(2): 98-105.

Gullo, C. A. O. and R. N. Powell. 1979. The effect of placement of cervical margins of Class II amalgam restorations on plaque accumulation and gingival health. J. Oral Rehabil. 6(4): 317-322.

Highfield, J. E. and R. N. Powell. 1978. Effects of removal of posterior overhanging metallic margins of restorations upon the periodontal tissues. J. Clin. Periodontol. 5(3): 169-181.

Jansson, L., H. Ehnevid, S. Lindskog and L. Blomlöf. 1994. Proximal restorations and periodontal status. J. Clin. Periodontol. 21(9): 577-582.

Karlsen, K. 1970. Gingival reactions to dental restorations. Acta Odontol. Scand. 28(6): 895-904.

Kells, B. E. and G. J. Linden. 1992. Overhanging amalgam restorations in young adults attending a periodontal department. J. Dent. 20(2): 85-89.

Keszthelyi, G. and I. Szabo. 1984. Influence of Class II amalgam fillings on attachment loss. J. Clin. Periodontol. 11(2): 81-86.

Lang, N. P., R. A. Kiel and K. Anderhalden. 1983. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J. Clin. Periodontol.

(6): 563-578.

Leon, A. R. 1976. Amalgam restorations and periodontal disease. Br. Dent. J. 140(11): 377-382.

Lervik, T., P. J. Riordan and O. Haugejorden. 1984. Periodontal disease and approximal overhangs on amalgam restorations in Norwegian 21-year-olds. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 12(4): 264-268.

Lightner, L. M., T. J. O’Leary, R. B. Drake, P. P. Crump and M. F. Allen. 1971. Preventive periodontic treatment procedures: Results over 46 months. J. Periodontol. 42(9): 555-561.

Lim, K. C. and G. H. Ong. 1989. Methods of proximal amalgam overhang removal-a comparison of different techniques. Ann. Acad Med. Singapore. 18(5): 599-602.

Lindhe, J., S. E. Hamp, and H. Löe. 1973. Experimental periodontitis in the beagle dog. J. Periodontal Res. 8(1): 1-10.

Mannerberg, F. 1971. Gingival changes following porcelain crown therapy. Odontol. Revy. 22: 155-162.

Mokeem, S. A. 2007. The impacts of amalgam overhang removal on periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid volume.Pak. Oral Dent. J. 27(1): 17-22.

Mörmann, W., B. Regolati and H. H. Renggli. 1974. Gingival reaction to well-fitted subgingival proximal gold inlays. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1(2): 120-125.

Nunn, M. E. 2003. Understanding the etiology of periodontitis: An overview of periodontal risk factors. Periodontology 2000. 32(1): 11-23.

Renggli, H. H. and B. Regolati. 1972. Gingival inflammation and plaque accumulation by well-adapted supragingival and subgingival proximal restorations. Helv. Odontol. Acta. 16(2): 99-101.

Rodriguez-Ferrer, H. J., J. D. Strahan and H. N. Newman. 1980. Effect on gingival health of removing overhanging margins of interproximal subgingival amalgam restorations. J. Clin. Periodontol. 7(6): 457-462.

Roman-Torres, C. V. G., S. C. Cortelli, M. W. B. de Araujo, D. R. Aquino and J. R. Cortelli. 2006. A short-term clinical and microbial evaluation of periodontal therapy associated with amalgam overhang removal. J. Periodontol. 77(9): 1591-1597.

Suomi, J. D., J. C. Greene, J. R. Vermillion, J. Doyle, J. J. Change and E. C. Leatherwood. 1971. The effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on the progression of periodontal disease in adults: Results after third and final year. J. Periodontol. 42(3): 152-160.

Trivedi, S. C. and S. T. Talim. 1973. The response of human gingiva to restorative materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 29(1): 73-80.

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Yawer Aldalawi, D. M., Saeed, D. H., & Ali, S. H. (2020). Effect of Different Methods for the Overhang Amalgam Restorations Removal on Periodontal Health Status. Polytechnic Journal, 10(1), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v10n1y2020.pp61-67

Issue

Section

Research Articles