Evaluation of Bond Strength and Dimensional Accuracy of Soft Liner to Microwave Cured Denture Base Material

Authors

  • Shilan H. Fatah Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Tishk International University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3548-8838
  • Radhwan H. Hasan Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Tishk International University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v10n2y2020.pp32-37

Keywords:

AL2O3 sandblasting, Nd:YAG laser, Polymethylmethacrylate, Shear bond strength, Soft liner

Abstract

Today, soft liners are being widely used in dental practices by their application to the inner surfaces of the denture with hopes to evenly distribute any potential uneven forces, and to provide a cushion effect to the oral mucosa of the patient mouth. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of (a) polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) denture base material curing technique, (b) Molloplast B soft liner curing technique, and (c) PMMA surface treatment, on the “shear bond strength” (SBS) between the Molloplast B liner and PMMA. A total of 80 samples were used in this study to evaluate the SBS performance of microwave (Nature-Cryl, Acron Gc, Japan) and conventional water bath (Ivoclar triplex, Liechtenstein) curing techniques of PMMA, and to evaluate the curing technique of soft liner material Molloplast B (DETAX,GERMANY). Surface treatment of PMMA was performed for half of the samples using neodymium:yttrium aluminum-garnet Nd:YAG laser, and the other half of the samples were surface-treated using AL2O3 sandblasting method. The results showed that the highest mean value in conventional water bath-cured soft liner was 26.69 MPa, whereas the lowest mean value for microwave-cured soft liner was 15.22 MPa. No significant difference was observed between the SBS performance regarding the PMMA surface treatment and curing techniques. Conventional water bath curing technique for soft liner treatment improved the SBS performance. Regarding the PMMA curing technique, the conventional water bath achieved higher SBS, yet the difference was not statistically significant. Finally, surface treatment using laser improved the SBS compared to sandblasted method, but the improvement here was also statistically insignificant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akin, H., F. Tugut, U. Guney, O. Kirmali and T. Akar. 2013. Tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner to two chemically different denture base resins after various surface treatments. Lasers Med. Sci. 28(1): 119-123.

Al-Athel, M., R. Jagger and D. Jagger. 2002. Effect of ageing on the bond strength of a permanent denture soft lining material. J. Oral Rehabil. 29(10): 992-996.

Amin, W., A. Fletcher and G. Ritchie. 1981. The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. J. Dent. 9(4): 336-346.

Anusavice, K. J. A. 1996. Philip’s Science of Dental Materials. WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA.

Arena, C. A., D. B. Evans and T. J. Hilton. 1993. A comparison of bond strengths among chairside hard reline materials. J Prosthet. Dent. 70: 126-131.

Aydın, A., H. Terzioğlu, A. Akınay, K. Ulubayram and N. Hasirci. 1999. Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent. Mater. 15(3): 211-218.

Aziz, H. K. 2017. Effect of the CO2 laser as surface treatment on the bond strength of heat cured soft liner to the high impact acrylic denture base material. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 29(1): 20-26.

Barbosa, D. B., M. Compagnoni and C. Leles. 2002. Changes in occlusal vertical dimension in microwave processing of complete dentures. Braz. Dent. J. 13(3): 197-200.

Barbosa, D. B., R. F. D. Souza, A. C. Pero, J. Marra and M. A. Compagnoni. 2007. Flexural strength of acrylic resins polymerized by different cycles. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 15(5): 424- 428.

Clancy, J. M., L. F. Hawkins, J. C. Keller and D. B. Boyer. 1991. Bond strength and failure analysis of light-cured denture resins bonded to denture teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent. 65(2): 315-324.

Consani, R. L. X., B. L. Folli, M. C. Nogueira, A. B. Correr and M. F. Mesquita. 2016. Effect of polymerization cycles on gloss, roughness, hardness and impact strength of acrylic resins. Braz. Dent. J. 27(2): 176-180.

Figueroa, R. M. S., B. Conterno, C. A. G. Arrais, C. Y. C. Sugio, V. M. Urban and K. H. Neppelenbroek. 2018. Porosity, water sorption and solubility of denture base acrylic resins polymerized conventionally or in microwave. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 26: e20170383.

Geerts, G. A. and C. H. Jooste. 1993. A comparison of the bond strengths of microwave-and water bath-cured denture material. J. Prosthet. Dent. 70(5): 406-409.

Gundogdu, M., Z. Y. Duymus and M. Alkurt. 2014. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of soft denture lining materials to an acrylic resin denture base. J. Prosthet. Dent. 112(4): 964-971.

Jacobsen, N. L., D. L. Mitchell, D. L. Johnson and R. A. Holt. 1997. Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding. J. Prosthet. Dent. 78(2): 153-158.

Jagger, R. 1978. Effect of the curing cycle on some properties of a polymethylmethacrylate denture base material. J. Oral Rehabil. 5: 151-157.

Khanna, A., V. M. Bhatnagar, K. T. Karani, K. Madria and S. Mistry. 2015. A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength between two commercially available heat cured resilient liners and denture base resin with different surface treatments. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 9(5): 30-34.

Korkmaz, F. M., B. Bagis, M. Özcan, R. Durkan, S. Turgut and S. M. Ates. 2013. Peel strength of denture liner to PMMA and polyamide: laser versus air-abrasion. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 5(3): 287-295.

Lai, C. P., M. H. Tsai, M. Chen, H. S. Chang and H. H. Tay. 2004. Morphology and properties of denture acrylic resins cured by microwave energy and conventional water bath. Dent. Mater. 20(2): 133-141.

Ng, E. T. L., B. Chew and H. Thean. 2004. Shear bond strength of microwaveable acrylic resin for denture repair. J. Oral Rehabil. 31(8): 798-802.

Ozkir, S. E., B. Yilmaz, S. M. Unal, A. Culhaoglu and I. Kurkcuoglu. 2018. Effect of heat polymerization conditions and microwave on the flexural strength of polymethyl methacrylate. Eur. J. Dent. 12(1): 116.

Salloum, A. M. 2013. Shear bond strength of three silicone lining materials bonded to heat-cured denture resin. King Saud Univ. J. Dent. Sci. 4(1): 17-20.

Salloum, A. M. 2014. Effect of aging on bond strength of two soft lining materials to a denture base polymer. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 14(1): 155-160.

Sauer, J. L. 1966. A clinical evaluation of Silastic 390 as a lining material for dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 16(4): 650-660.

Singh, S., J. N. Palaskar and S. Mittal. 2013. Comparative evaluation of surface porosities in conventional heat polymerized acrylic resin cured by water bath and microwave energy with microwavable acrylic resin cured by microwave energy. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 4(2): 147-51.

Skinner, E. W. and R. W. Phillips. 1982. Skinner’s Science of Dental Materials. 8th ed. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, PA. Tata, S. and D. Nandeeshwar. 2012. A clinical study to evaluate and compare the masticatory performance in complete denture wearers with and without soft liners. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 13(6): 787-792.

Usumez, A., O. Inan and F. Aykent. 2004. Bond strength of a silicone lining material to alumina-abraded and lased denture resin. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B. 71(1): 196-200.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Fatah, S. H., & Hasan, R. H. (2020). Evaluation of Bond Strength and Dimensional Accuracy of Soft Liner to Microwave Cured Denture Base Material. Polytechnic Journal, 10(2), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v10n2y2020.pp32-37

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Shilan H. Fatah, Radhwan H. Hasan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).