Delay in Construction Projects due to Lack of Procurement in Sulaimani

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v11n1y2021.pp126-133

Keywords:

Contracts and tendering, Delivery, Procurement unit, Purchase and sell, Supply

Abstract

The study was conducted to find the effect of procurement unit (PU) on the performance of institutions that are under the government’s ministries. The study concluded that the constructional sectors that had PU offered more capable services by a relative important index (RII) proportion of 85%. The practical part of the study was done through a questionnaire that was distributed among 10 professional managers, who had actual experience in the process of constructional duties. The study was conducted on the percentage of each category factor that affected the PU. The theoretical part proved that a lack of management was the most sensitive factor with a frequency proportion of 11.6%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdalla, M. and H. T. B. Odeh. 2002. Causes of construction delay: Traditional contracts. Project Manage. 20: 67-73.

Abisuga, A., O. R. O. Amusu and K. A. Salvador. 2014. Construction delay in Nigeria: A perception of indigenous and multinational construction firms. Emerg. Trends Econ. Manage. Sci. 5(3): 371- 378.

Aibinu, A. A. and G. Jagboro. 2002. The effects of construction delays on project delivery in Nigerian construction industry. Project Manage. 20: 593-599.

Al-Momani, A. H. 2000. Construction delay: A quantitative analysis. Project Manage. 18(1): 51-59.

Commission, E. 2015. Public Procerement Guidance for Practitions. Belgium: Office of the European Union.

Daniel, Q. M. C. and M. M. Kumaraswamy. 2002. Compressing construction duration: Lessons leaened from Hong Kong building projects. Project Manage. 20: 23-35.

Eldon, A. and A. K. Gunn. 1986. The procurement problem: An integer programming problem well suited to a solution using duality. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 33: 613-620.

Hakan Polatoglu, I. S. 2000. Optimal procurement policies under price-dependent demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 65(65): 141-171.

Kometa, S. T., P. O. Olomolaiye and F. C. Harris. 1994. Attributes of UK construction clients influencing. Construct. Manage. Econ. 12: 433-443.

Mansfield, N. R., O. O. Ugwu and T. Doran. 1994. Causes of delay and cost overruns in Nigerian construction projects. Project Manage. 12(4): 254-260.

Mohan, R. M. and D. K. Adhikarib. 2002. Material and equipment procurement delays in highway projects in Nepal. Project Manage. 20: 627-632.

Presidency, O. P. 2016. Procurement Regulations for IPF Borrowers. Procurement in Investment Project Financing. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.

Programme UND. 2016. UNDP Procurement Services Unit. Programme UND, New York.

Sadi, A. A. and S. Al-Hejji. 2006. Causes of delay in large construction projects. Project Manage. 24: 349-357.

Stephen, O. O. and K. Promkuntong. 1996. Construction delays in a fast-growing economy: Comparing Thailand with other economies. Project Manage. 14(1): 37-45.

World Bank. 2017. Procurement in IPF and Other Operational Procurement Matters. World Bank, New York.

Yaw Frimpong, J. O. 2003. Causes of delay and cost overruns in construction of groundwater projects in a developing countries;Ghana as a case study. Int. J. Project Manage. 21: 321-326.

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Abdullah, A. K., & Shonm, P. A. (2021). Delay in Construction Projects due to Lack of Procurement in Sulaimani. Polytechnic Journal, 11(1), 126-133. https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v11n1y2021.pp126-133

Issue

Section

Research Articles