A Semantic Analysis of Quasi-Modals in VESAL 10:

A Study in Polysemy

Authors

  • Sangar Najim Ministry of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25156/ptjhss.v3n2y2022.pp211-219

Abstract

English modal verbs (both central and quasi-modals) have more than one interrelated meanings. This flexibility in meanings belongs to the polysemous phenomenon, in which it exposes the diversity of meanings within the same lexeme. Due to the importance of using modals in academic writing, this paper aims at analysing fourteen quasi-modals (henceforth QM) in (VESAL 10)[1], in the shed of the polysemous view. In its conference proceedings book, twenty-one academic papers have been published. QMs have their own importance in the academic atmosphere. They indicate the author's attitude towards any statement within the text. The researcher verifies the hypothesis by presenting the results of the analysis. The current paper aims at identifying the most frequent polysemy of QMs, examining the meanings and the functions of QMs, and presenting a frequency range of QMs in (VESAL 10). The paper ends up with findings that are inferred from the results of the study, where the (be to, need, need to, want to, and have to) are the most frequent QMs, while the (have got to, be supposed to, be bound to etc.) are the least common, since they have recorded zero frequency. Nevertheless, the most frequent meanings of QMs are (necessity, logical necessity, temporal meanings and obligation).

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biber, D., & Quirk, R. (2007). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.

Celce-Murcia, M., Larsen-Freeman, D. & Williams, H., (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course. 2nd ed. US: Heinle & Heinle.

Coates, J., (2015). The Semantics of the Modal Auxilaries. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Collins, P., (2009). Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Netherlands: Rodopi.

Hykes, J. M., (2000). 'A Comparison of the Use of Modal Verbs in Research Articles by Professionals and Non-native Speaking Graduate Students' MA thesis,. Iowa State University: Ames. [available at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8928&context=rtd]

Leech, G., (2013). Meaning and The English Verb. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.

Machová, D., (2015). Polyfunctionality and the Ongoing History of English Modals. phD dessertaion. s.l.:Palacký University in Olomouc. available at: https://theses.cz/id/91naus/Machova_D_-_Polyfunctionality_and_the_Ongoing_History_of_.pdf. (Accessed: 18 Feb 2019)..

Najim, S. (2019), A Semantic Study of the Polysemy of Modal Verbs in English Journalism. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Salahaddin University, Erbil.

Palmer, F.R. (1990) Modality and the English modals. Harlow: Longman.

Perkins, M. (1983) Modal expressions in English. London: Francis Pinter.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J., (1985). A Comperhensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman Group Limited.

VESAL (International Visible Conference on Educational Studies & Applied Linguistics) Education In Times Of Change 2019, Tishk International University, Erbil. Iraq, 26-27 April 2019. Available at: [ https://www.ishik.edu.iq/conf/vesal/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/absbook.pdf ]

Vincent, B., (2014). Modlaity and The V WH Pattern. A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF: Available at: https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/6311/1/Vincent15PhD.pdf. [Accessed: 8 June 2019].

Published

2022-12-09

How to Cite

Najim, S. . (2022). A Semantic Analysis of Quasi-Modals in VESAL 10:: A Study in Polysemy . Polytechnic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.25156/ptjhss.v3n2y2022.pp211-219

Issue

Section

Research Articles