The Role of Actors in Peacebuilding

Abstract

Abstract

The end of armed conflict does not mean that peace and stability have been achieved, because the post-armed conflict phase is no less dangerous than the conflict itself, because any failure in peace negotiations or any escalation of the situation may aggravate the situation and increase the likelihood of renewed conflict.

Peacebuilding is one of the topics that fall within the core of the internal competence of states, as it aims to rebuild the political and administrative institutions of countries emerging from conflict, and because the peacebuilding process is one of the complex and long-term processes, and the national efforts and mechanisms carried out by countries emerging from conflict are sometimes not enough to promote the peacebuilding process, which requires concerted efforts and international mechanisms in addition to internal mechanisms in order to make this process successful and promote sustainable peace. The State is primarily responsible for restoring peace to its territory, assisted in this by the international community with its various entities to ensure a lasting peace on solid and fragile foundations. Among the most important international mechanisms are the United Nations as the parent organization responsible for establishing international peace and security in accordance with its Charter, as well as the role of international non-governmental organizations, which has begun to develop significantly in recent years through support for peace operations, conflict resolution, humanitarian assistance, rapid response capacity to human disasters, promotion of the development process, protection of the environment, etc.

In order to translate the reality of the work of international forces, two models were selected for the work of international forces in two different regions of the world and then evaluated the work of international forces in general in the world to come up with the results of the study.