An Analysis of the Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes

Authors

  • Diyar A. Khalil Department of Philosophy, College of Arts, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • Rabar A. Ahmed Department of Philosophy, College of Arts, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • Safwan T. Hamad Tahir

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25156/ptjhss.v4n1y2023.pp946-953

Keywords:

Hobbes, Leviathan, Political Philosophy, Reconciliation, Totalitarianism

Abstract

Thomas Hobbes lived through political strife, civil war, social disorder; Such circumstances influenced his political views. To understand the content of his political philosophy, in addition to taking into account the time of his life, his views on the human nature must not be forgotten. In fact, these two aspects are key to understanding his intentions and goals in forming a totalitarian state. Hobbes tries to start his ideas about political philosophy with an intellectual assumption, “The natural condition of mankind" and gradually enter the essence of what he wanted to achieve, which is the “commonwealth”. A strong state, where someone rules and dominates, but a state based on social contract, in order to meet the public interest and the demands of citizens. In order to analyze the political philosophy of this great philosopher, the analytical method has been adopted, trying to analyze the reasons that led Hobbes to consider the existence of the commonwealth as necessary and compulsory. How does he provide rational evidence to justify absolute power? How does it define the rights and duties of citizens? What are the duties and rights of the ruler? And what does it base the principles of the state on? An attempt has been made to answer these questions within the framework of Hobbes' political philosophy, especially in his views on Leviathan, by analyzing his texts and using the analysis made for him.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. 6. REFERENCES

Hampsher-monk, I. (1992). A History of modern political thought (Major political thinkers from Hobbes to Marx. Oxford: oxford university press.

Macpherson, C. (1962). The plotical Theory of possessive individualism (Hobbes to Lock). london.

Rogers, G. A. (1988). Hobbes and royal society. Oxford: oxford university press.

بدوی, د. ع. (٢٠٠٧). موسوعة الفلسفه. قم: ذوی قربی.

برگمن, گ. (١٣٩٠). كتاب كوچك فلسفه (١٠Ed., &)، ( ك. قبادیان، ترجمه) تهران: چاپ و صحافی کهنمویی.

پولادی, د. ( ٢٠٠٥). مێژووی هزری سیاسی له‌رۆژئاو (ئ. وه‌له‌دبە‌گی، وەرگێر)، هه‌ولێر: چاپخانەی وه‌زاره‌تی په‌روه‌رده‌.

پولادی, د. (٢٠٠٦). لە دەوڵەتی دەسەڵاتەوە تا دەوڵەتی ئەقڵ. (س. ج. زه‌ندى، وەرگێر). هەولێر: دەزگای توێژینەوە و بڵاوکردنەوەی موکریانی.

عالم, د. (١٣٨٧). بنیادهاى علم سیاست (١٨: ed)، تهران: نشر نی.

عزیز, د. (٢٠١٢). فەلسەفەی نوێ لە ئەوروپا. هەولێر: دەزگای ئاوێر.

کاپلستون, ف. (١٣٨٢). تاریخ فلسفه. (ا. ج. مجتبوی, ترجمه) تهران: شركت علمى و فرهنگى سروش (انتشارات صدا و سیما).

لیدمان, س. ئ. (٢٠٠٩). رێگوزه‌رى بیرى سیاسى. (ئ. شه‌فیق،وەرگێر)، سولەیمانی: نییە.

ماگی, ب. (١٣٨٨). داستان فلسفه‌. (م. ص. علامه، ترجمه). تهران: کتاب امه.

مکفرسون, س. ب. (١٣٨٧). مقدمه و ویرایش لویاتان. (ح. بشیریه, ترجمه) تهران: نشر نی.

میسنر, م. (١٣٨٥). فلسفه هابز. (خ. دیهمی، ترجمه) تهران: طرح نو.

نظری, ع. ا. (١٣٨٤) مفهوم قدرت در اندیشه سیاسی هابز. مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی, ٦٩, ٢٦٣.

هابز, ت. (١٣٨٧) لویاتان (٥: ed) س. ب. مکفرسون, Ed., & (ح. بشیریه، ترجمه) تهران: نشر نی.

واربرتون, ن. (١٣٩١). اثار کلاسیک فلسفه (٥: ed ) (م. علیا، ترجمه)، تهران: انتشارات ققنوس.

Published

2023-05-29

How to Cite

خليل د. ., احمد ر. ع. ., & حمدطاهر ص. ط. . (2023). An Analysis of the Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Polytechnic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 946-953. https://doi.org/10.25156/ptjhss.v4n1y2023.pp946-953

Issue

Section

Research Articles